Gabon vs Lithuania: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Gabon
- Lithuania
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 4,932 kt against 4,737 kt in Lithuania, a difference of 195 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Gabon ranks 56th and Lithuania ranks 57th of 217 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,158 kt | 5,718 kt | 559.8 kt | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 2,100 kt | 5,147 kt | 3,047 kt | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 6,323 kt | 968.15 kt | 5,355 kt | Gabon |
| 2020s | 4,926 kt | 4,173 kt | 753.49 kt | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Gabon or Lithuania?
- Gabon, at 4,932 kt against 4,737 kt in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Gabon and Lithuania?
- 195 kt, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Gabon and Lithuania rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Gabon ranks 56th and Lithuania ranks 57th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf