Georgia vs Pakistan: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Georgia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports -3,498 kt against -4,363 kt in Georgia, a difference of 865 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Pakistan ahead.
Georgia ranks 229th and Pakistan ranks 226th of 257 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -3,711 kt | 2,365 kt | 6,076 kt | Pakistan |
| 2000s | -5,473 kt | 2,487 kt | 7,960 kt | Pakistan |
| 2010s | -3,770 kt | 723.06 kt | 4,493 kt | Pakistan |
| 2020s | -4,019 kt | -3,650 kt | 368.5 kt | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Georgia or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at -3,498 kt against -4,363 kt in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Georgia and Pakistan?
- 865 kt, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Pakistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Pakistan rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Georgia ranks 229th and Pakistan ranks 226th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf