Israel vs New Caledonia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Israel
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 109th and New Caledonia ranks 109th of 222 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 66 kt | -209 kt | 275 kt | Israel |
| 2000s | -26.4 kt | -53.9 kt | 27.5 kt | Israel |
| 2010s | -33 kt | -1,661 kt | 1,628 kt | Israel |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Israel or New Caledonia?
- Israel, at 0 kt against 0 kt in New Caledonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Israel and New Caledonia?
- 0 kt, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and New Caledonia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Israel and New Caledonia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Israel ranks 109th and New Caledonia ranks 109th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf