Laos vs Uganda: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Laos
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 11,322 kt against 9,878 kt in Laos, a difference of 1,444 kt.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Laos's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Laos ranks 49th and Uganda ranks 47th of 257 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,089 kt | 33,814 kt | 25,725 kt | Uganda |
| 2000s | -55,981 kt | 19,657 kt | 75,638 kt | Uganda |
| 2010s | 10,967 kt | 25,810 kt | 14,843 kt | Uganda |
| 2020s | 13,030 kt | 17,843 kt | 4,814 kt | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Laos or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 11,322 kt against 9,878 kt in Laos as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Laos and Uganda?
- 1,444 kt, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Uganda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Laos and Uganda rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Laos ranks 49th and Uganda ranks 47th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf