Liberia vs Mongolia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Liberia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 22,949 kt against 22,193 kt in Mongolia, a difference of 756 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mongolia ahead.
Liberia ranks 24th and Mongolia ranks 26th of 217 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 90.09 kt | 23,407 kt | 23,317 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 19,816 kt | 23,468 kt | 3,652 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 57,955 kt | 22,639 kt | 35,316 kt | Liberia |
| 2020s | 31,511 kt | 22,217 kt | 9,294 kt | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Liberia or Mongolia?
- Liberia, at 22,949 kt against 22,193 kt in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Liberia and Mongolia?
- 756 kt, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Mongolia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Liberia and Mongolia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Liberia ranks 24th and Mongolia ranks 26th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf