Libya vs Montenegro: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Libya
- Montenegro
How they compare
Libya currently reports 29.33 kt against 18.57 kt in Montenegro, a difference of 10.76 kt.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.6 times Montenegro's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 95th and Montenegro ranks 98th of 217 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.33 kt | -6,812 kt | 6,841 kt | Libya |
| 2010s | 35.93 kt | -651.41 kt | 687.35 kt | Libya |
| 2020s | 31.17 kt | 18.57 kt | 12.59 kt | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Libya or Montenegro?
- Libya, at 29.33 kt against 18.57 kt in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Libya and Montenegro?
- 10.76 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Montenegro rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Libya ranks 95th and Montenegro ranks 98th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf