Morocco vs Norway: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Morocco
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 5,416 kt against 5,331 kt in Morocco, a difference of 85 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Morocco ahead.
Morocco ranks 64th and Norway ranks 62nd of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -8,199 kt | -11,145 kt | 2,946 kt | Morocco |
| 2000s | -4,077 kt | -18,055 kt | 13,978 kt | Morocco |
| 2010s | -3,000 kt | -10,650 kt | 7,650 kt | Morocco |
| 2020s | 3,058 kt | 3,167 kt | 109.39 kt | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Morocco or Norway?
- Norway, at 5,416 kt against 5,331 kt in Morocco as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Morocco and Norway?
- 85 kt, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Norway?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Morocco and Norway rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Morocco ranks 64th and Norway ranks 62nd of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf