Nepal vs Slovakia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Nepal
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports -1,753 kt against -1,777 kt in Nepal, a difference of 24 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 216th and Slovakia ranks 215th of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 3 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1,921 kt | -9,399 kt | 7,477 kt | Nepal |
| 2000s | -1,703 kt | -8,471 kt | 6,768 kt | Nepal |
| 2010s | -78.59 kt | -5,197 kt | 5,118 kt | Nepal |
| 2020s | -1,773 kt | -1,673 kt | 100.77 kt | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Nepal or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at -1,753 kt against -1,777 kt in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Nepal and Slovakia?
- 24 kt, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Nepal and Slovakia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Nepal ranks 216th and Slovakia ranks 215th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf