Romania vs Rwanda: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Romania
- Rwanda
How they compare
Romania currently reports -7,346 kt against -11,102 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 3,756 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Romania ranks 197th and Rwanda ranks 198th of 217 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -14,747 kt | 2,264 kt | 17,011 kt | Rwanda |
| 2000s | -23,610 kt | 38.23 kt | 23,648 kt | Rwanda |
| 2010s | -40,181 kt | -4,553 kt | 35,629 kt | Rwanda |
| 2020s | -16,128 kt | -10,758 kt | 5,370 kt | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Romania or Rwanda?
- Romania, at -7,346 kt against -11,102 kt in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Romania and Rwanda?
- 3,756 kt, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Rwanda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Romania and Rwanda rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Romania ranks 197th and Rwanda ranks 198th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf