Romania vs Turkey: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Romania
- Turkey
How they compare
Turkey currently reports -6,905 kt against -7,346 kt in Romania, a difference of 441 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 235th and Turkey ranks 233rd of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 2 and Turkey in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -14,747 kt | -16,940 kt | 2,193 kt | Romania |
| 2000s | -23,610 kt | -40,357 kt | 16,747 kt | Romania |
| 2010s | -40,181 kt | -30,037 kt | 10,144 kt | Turkey |
| 2020s | -16,128 kt | -2,620 kt | 13,508 kt | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Romania or Turkey?
- Turkey, at -6,905 kt against -7,346 kt in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Romania and Turkey?
- 441 kt, with Turkey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Turkey?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Romania and Turkey rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Romania ranks 235th and Turkey ranks 233rd of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf