Slovakia vs Syria: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Slovakia
- Syria
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports -1,753 kt against -1,885 kt in Syria, a difference of 132 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Syria ahead.
Slovakia ranks 215th and Syria ranks 218th of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Slovakia averaged higher in 1 and Syria in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -9,399 kt | -1,525 kt | 7,873 kt | Syria |
| 2000s | -8,471 kt | -1,680 kt | 6,791 kt | Syria |
| 2010s | -5,197 kt | -1,524 kt | 3,672 kt | Syria |
| 2020s | -1,673 kt | -1,758 kt | 85.56 kt | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Slovakia or Syria?
- Slovakia, at -1,753 kt against -1,885 kt in Syria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Slovakia and Syria?
- 132 kt, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Syria?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Slovakia and Syria rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Slovakia ranks 215th and Syria ranks 218th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf