South Sudan vs Sweden: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- South Sudan
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 9,838 kt against 9,041 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 797 kt.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 53rd and Sweden ranks 51st of 257 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9,262 kt | -14,468 kt | 23,730 kt | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 9,164 kt | 7,994 kt | 1,170 kt | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, South Sudan or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 9,838 kt against 9,041 kt in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between South Sudan and Sweden?
- 797 kt, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Sweden?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Sweden rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- South Sudan ranks 53rd and Sweden ranks 51st of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf