Syria vs Uruguay: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Syria
- Uruguay
How they compare
Syria currently reports -1,885 kt against -2,053 kt in Uruguay, a difference of 168 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Syria ahead.
Syria ranks 218th and Uruguay ranks 221st of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Syria averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Syria | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1,525 kt | -6,713 kt | 5,188 kt | Syria |
| 2000s | -1,680 kt | -8,048 kt | 6,368 kt | Syria |
| 2010s | -1,524 kt | -5,539 kt | 4,014 kt | Syria |
| 2020s | -1,758 kt | -1,332 kt | 426.4 kt | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Syria or Uruguay?
- Syria, at -1,885 kt against -2,053 kt in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Syria and Uruguay?
- 168 kt, with Syria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syria and Uruguay?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Syria and Uruguay rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Syria ranks 218th and Uruguay ranks 221st of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf