Belgium vs Moldova: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq)
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Belgium
- Moldova
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 202.7 kt against 193.85 kt in Moldova, a difference of 8.85 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Moldova ahead.
Belgium ranks 101st and Moldova ranks 102nd of 257 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Moldova in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -3,072 kt | -854.73 kt | 2,217 kt | Moldova |
| 2010s | -186.44 kt | -206.15 kt | 19.72 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 947.45 kt | 197.28 kt | 750.17 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq), Belgium or Moldova?
- Belgium, at 202.7 kt against 193.85 kt in Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium and Moldova?
- 8.85 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Moldova?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Moldova rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belgium ranks 101st and Moldova ranks 102nd of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf