Central African Republic vs Small Island Developing States (SIDS): LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)

Central African Republic
40,753 kt
in 2023
Small Island Developing States (SIDS)
55,542 kt
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
20th
Small Island Developing States (SIDS) rank
17th

LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Small Island Developing States (SIDS)
020.0k40.0k60.0k199020062023

How they compare

Small Island Developing States (SIDS) currently reports 55,542 kt against 40,753 kt in Central African Republic, a difference of 14,789 kt.

That makes Small Island Developing States (SIDS)'s figure about 1.4 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 20th and Small Island Developing States (SIDS) ranks 17th of 257 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Small Island Developing States (SIDS) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Small Island Developing States (SIDS) Difference Ahead
1990s 32,407 kt 29,345 kt 3,062 kt Central African Republic
2000s 38,786 kt 24,589 kt 14,197 kt Central African Republic
2010s 42,889 kt 43,441 kt 551.95 kt Small Island Developing States (SIDS)
2020s 44,740 kt 54,299 kt 9,558 kt Small Island Developing States (SIDS)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq), Central African Republic or Small Island Developing States (SIDS)?
Small Island Developing States (SIDS), at 55,542 kt against 40,753 kt in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) between Central African Republic and Small Island Developing States (SIDS)?
14,789 kt, with Small Island Developing States (SIDS) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Small Island Developing States (SIDS)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Small Island Developing States (SIDS) rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq)?
Central African Republic ranks 20th and Small Island Developing States (SIDS) ranks 17th of 257 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Small Island Developing States (SIDS): LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/lulucf-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/central-african-republic/small-island-developing-states-sids/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/lulucf-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/central-african-republic/small-island-developing-states-sids/">Central African Republic vs Small Island Developing States (SIDS): LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
291 places, 9,669 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf