Chad vs Mali: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq)
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Chad
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 22,675 kt against 21,314 kt in Chad, a difference of 1,361 kt.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 27th and Mali ranks 25th of 217 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,269 kt | 24,028 kt | 14,759 kt | Mali |
| 2000s | 14,281 kt | 25,626 kt | 11,345 kt | Mali |
| 2010s | 21,466 kt | 26,772 kt | 5,306 kt | Mali |
| 2020s | 21,547 kt | 23,136 kt | 1,588 kt | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq), Chad or Mali?
- Mali, at 22,675 kt against 21,314 kt in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) between Chad and Mali?
- 1,361 kt, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mali?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Mali rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq)?
- Chad ranks 27th and Mali ranks 25th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf