Cook Islands vs Egypt: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Cook Islands
- Egypt
How they compare
Cook Islands currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Egypt, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Cook Islands ranks 131st and Egypt ranks 131st of 257 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -22 kt | 0.1197 kt | 22.12 kt | Egypt |
| 2000s | -2.2 kt | 0 kt | 2.2 kt | Egypt |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq), Cook Islands or Egypt?
- Cook Islands, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) between Cook Islands and Egypt?
- 0 kt, with Cook Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Egypt?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cook Islands and Egypt rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq)?
- Cook Islands ranks 131st and Egypt ranks 131st of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf