Cuba vs Norway: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Cuba
- Norway
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 5,626 kt against 5,416 kt in Norway, a difference of 210 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 60th and Norway ranks 63rd of 257 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -6,882 kt | -11,143 kt | 4,261 kt | Cuba |
| 2000s | -16,529 kt | -18,055 kt | 1,526 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | -5,448 kt | -10,650 kt | 5,202 kt | Cuba |
| 2020s | 3,007 kt | 3,167 kt | 160.82 kt | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq), Cuba or Norway?
- Cuba, at 5,626 kt against 5,416 kt in Norway as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) between Cuba and Norway?
- 210 kt, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Norway?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Norway rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq)?
- Cuba ranks 60th and Norway ranks 63rd of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf