Ecuador vs South Sudan: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Ecuador
- South Sudan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 12,297 kt against 10,684 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 1,613 kt.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times South Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 47th and South Sudan ranks 50th of 257 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23,080 kt | 10,455 kt | 12,626 kt | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 16,505 kt | 11,463 kt | 5,042 kt | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq), Ecuador or South Sudan?
- Ecuador, at 12,297 kt against 10,684 kt in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) between Ecuador and South Sudan?
- 1,613 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and South Sudan rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq)?
- Ecuador ranks 47th and South Sudan ranks 50th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf