Ireland vs South Sudan: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Ireland
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 10,684 kt against 10,588 kt in Ireland, a difference of 96 kt.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Ireland ranks 51st and South Sudan ranks 50th of 257 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6,056 kt | 10,455 kt | 4,398 kt | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 9,567 kt | 11,463 kt | 1,896 kt | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq), Ireland or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 10,684 kt against 10,588 kt in Ireland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) between Ireland and South Sudan?
- 96 kt, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Ireland and South Sudan rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq)?
- Ireland ranks 51st and South Sudan ranks 50th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf