Japan vs Serbia: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Japan
- Serbia
How they compare
Japan currently reports -25,014 kt against -25,261 kt in Serbia, a difference of 247 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Japan ranks 241st and Serbia ranks 242nd of 257 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -154,876 kt | -24,753 kt | 130,123 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | -75,847 kt | -24,543 kt | 51,303 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | -33,762 kt | -24,814 kt | 8,948 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq), Japan or Serbia?
- Japan, at -25,014 kt against -25,261 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) between Japan and Serbia?
- 247 kt, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Serbia rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq)?
- Japan ranks 241st and Serbia ranks 242nd of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf