Mali vs Mongolia: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq)
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Mali
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mali currently reports 22,675 kt against 22,194 kt in Mongolia, a difference of 481 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 25th and Mongolia ranks 26th of 217 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24,028 kt | 23,803 kt | 225.25 kt | Mali |
| 2000s | 25,626 kt | 23,560 kt | 2,066 kt | Mali |
| 2010s | 26,772 kt | 22,652 kt | 4,120 kt | Mali |
| 2020s | 23,136 kt | 22,217 kt | 918.15 kt | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq), Mali or Mongolia?
- Mali, at 22,675 kt against 22,194 kt in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) between Mali and Mongolia?
- 481 kt, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Mongolia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Mongolia rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq)?
- Mali ranks 25th and Mongolia ranks 26th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf