Oceania vs Sudan: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Oceania
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 45,807 kt against 6,187 kt in Oceania, a difference of 39,620 kt.
That makes Sudan's figure about 7.4 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Oceania ranks 20th and Sudan ranks 18th of 33 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Oceania averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -7,184 kt | -22,932 kt | 15,749 kt | Oceania |
| 2020s | 6,704 kt | 22,930 kt | 16,225 kt | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq), Oceania or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 45,807 kt against 6,187 kt in Oceania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) between Oceania and Sudan?
- 39,620 kt, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Oceania and Sudan rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq)?
- Oceania ranks 20th and Sudan ranks 18th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf