United Republic of Tanzania vs Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of): LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq)

United Republic of Tanzania
67,771 kt
in 2023
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
26,283 kt
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania rank
9th
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) rank
27th

LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • United Republic of Tanzania
  • Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199020062023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 67,771 kt against 26,283 kt in Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), a difference of 41,488 kt.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 2.6 times Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) ahead.

United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) ranks 27th of 257 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, United Republic of Tanzania averaged higher in 3 and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Republic of Tanzania Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Difference Ahead
1990s 60,518 kt 65,769 kt 5,251 kt Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
2000s 64,137 kt 46,002 kt 18,135 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 67,959 kt 51,148 kt 16,811 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 69,192 kt 33,171 kt 36,020 kt United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq), United Republic of Tanzania or Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 67,771 kt against 26,283 kt in Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) between United Republic of Tanzania and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)?
41,488 kt, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Republic of Tanzania and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do United Republic of Tanzania and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq)?
United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) ranks 27th of 257 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Republic of Tanzania vs Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of): LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/lulucf-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/united-republic-of-tanzania/venezuela-bolivarian-republic-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/lulucf-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/united-republic-of-tanzania/venezuela-bolivarian-republic-of/">United Republic of Tanzania vs Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of): LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
291 places, 9,669 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf