Australia vs Chad: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC over time
- Australia
- Chad
How they compare
Chad currently reports -37,694 kt against -42,694 kt in Australia, a difference of 5,000 kt.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 74th and Chad ranks 71st of 89 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35,834 kt | -37,053 kt | 72,887 kt | Australia |
| 2000s | 47,815 kt | -42,834 kt | 90,649 kt | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5) — unfccc, Australia or Chad?
- Chad, at -37,694 kt against -42,694 kt in Australia as of 2003.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5) — unfccc between Australia and Chad?
- 5,000 kt, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chad?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2003.
- How do Australia and Chad rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5) — unfccc?
- Australia ranks 74th and Chad ranks 71st of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf