Latvia vs Mongolia: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC over time
- Latvia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports -2,083 kt against -2,581 kt in Latvia, a difference of 498 kt.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 44th and Mongolia ranks 41st of 83 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -14,985 kt | 482.71 kt | 15,468 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | -7,726 kt | -2,083 kt | 5,644 kt | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5) — unfccc, Latvia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at -2,083 kt against -2,581 kt in Latvia as of 2006.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5) — unfccc between Latvia and Mongolia?
- 498 kt, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2006.
- How do Latvia and Mongolia rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5) — unfccc?
- Latvia ranks 44th and Mongolia ranks 41st of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf