Mongolia vs Tajikistan: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC over time
- Mongolia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports -2,083 kt against -2,092 kt in Tajikistan, a difference of 9 kt.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 41st and Tajikistan ranks 42nd of 83 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 482.71 kt | -1,881 kt | 2,364 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | -2,083 kt | -2,086 kt | 3.42 kt | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5) — unfccc, Mongolia or Tajikistan?
- Mongolia, at -2,083 kt against -2,092 kt in Tajikistan as of 2006.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5) — unfccc between Mongolia and Tajikistan?
- 9 kt, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Tajikistan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2006.
- How do Mongolia and Tajikistan rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5) — unfccc?
- Mongolia ranks 41st and Tajikistan ranks 42nd of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf