Mauritius vs Sweden: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time
- Mauritius
- Sweden
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 106th and Sweden ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.04 kt | 1.75 kt | 1.71 kt | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.191 kt | 0.191 kt | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 2.94 kt | 2.94 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Mauritius or Sweden?
- Mauritius, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Mauritius and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sweden?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Sweden rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Mauritius ranks 106th and Sweden ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf