Central African Republic vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Central African Republic
7,293 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo
10,266 kt
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
2nd
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
4th

LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
05.0k10.0k15.0k199020062023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 10,266 kt against 7,293 kt in Central African Republic, a difference of 2,973 kt.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 1.4 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 2nd and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 4th of 219 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 5,526 kt 10,433 kt 4,907 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 9,115 kt 13,447 kt 4,332 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 10,011 kt 15,150 kt 5,139 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 9,142 kt 12,067 kt 2,925 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Central African Republic or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 10,266 kt against 7,293 kt in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
2,973 kt, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Central African Republic ranks 2nd and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 4th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/central-african-republic/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/central-african-republic/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Central African Republic vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
273 places, 9,061 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf