Austria vs Belgium: LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC over time
- Austria
- Belgium
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0.4305 kt against 0.3813 kt in Belgium, a difference of 0.0492 kt.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 38th and Belgium ranks 40th of 69 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3655 kt | 0.2336 kt | 0.132 kt | Austria |
| 2010s | 0.4053 kt | 0.3755 kt | 0.0298 kt | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc, Austria or Belgium?
- Austria, at 0.4305 kt against 0.3813 kt in Belgium as of 2019.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc between Austria and Belgium?
- 0.0492 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belgium?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Belgium rank globally for lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc?
- Austria ranks 38th and Belgium ranks 40th of 69 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf