Belgium vs Chile: LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC over time
- Belgium
- Chile
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.3813 kt against 0.3 kt in Chile, a difference of 0.0813 kt.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.3 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 35th and Chile ranks 38th of 63 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.21 kt | 0.7305 kt | 0.5205 kt | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.3487 kt | 0.275 kt | 0.0737 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc, Belgium or Chile?
- Belgium, at 0.3813 kt against 0.3 kt in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc between Belgium and Chile?
- 0.0813 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Chile?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Belgium and Chile rank globally for lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc?
- Belgium ranks 35th and Chile ranks 38th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf