Belgium vs New Zealand: LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC over time
- Belgium
- New Zealand
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.3813 kt against 0.3721 kt in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0092 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.
Belgium ranks 33rd and New Zealand ranks 34th of 60 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2336 kt | 0.7531 kt | 0.5196 kt | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.3755 kt | 0.5166 kt | 0.1411 kt | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc, Belgium or New Zealand?
- Belgium, at 0.3813 kt against 0.3721 kt in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc between Belgium and New Zealand?
- 0.0092 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and New Zealand?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Belgium and New Zealand rank globally for lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc?
- Belgium ranks 33rd and New Zealand ranks 34th of 60 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf