Canada vs Mexico: LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC over time
- Canada
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 1.24 kt against 1.23 kt in Canada, a difference of 0.01 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 21st and Mexico ranks 20th of 63 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.83 kt | 1.11 kt | 0.719 kt | Canada |
| 2000s | 1.64 kt | 0.7055 kt | 0.9393 kt | Canada |
| 2010s | 1.43 kt | 1.59 kt | 0.1603 kt | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc, Canada or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 1.24 kt against 1.23 kt in Canada as of 2013.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc between Canada and Mexico?
- 0.01 kt, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Mexico?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2013.
- How do Canada and Mexico rank globally for lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc?
- Canada ranks 21st and Mexico ranks 20th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf