Cyprus vs Monaco: LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC over time
- Cyprus
- Monaco
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 0.0006 kt against 0 kt in Monaco, a difference of 0.0006 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 60th and Monaco ranks 63rd of 63 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0008 kt | 0 kt | 0.0008 kt | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 0.0019 kt | 0 kt | 0.0019 kt | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 0.0021 kt | 0 kt | 0.0021 kt | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc, Cyprus or Monaco?
- Cyprus, at 0.0006 kt against 0 kt in Monaco as of 2019.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc between Cyprus and Monaco?
- 0.0006 kt, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Monaco?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Cyprus and Monaco rank globally for lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc?
- Cyprus ranks 60th and Monaco ranks 63rd of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf