Iceland vs Kenya: LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC over time
- Iceland
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 0.03 kt against 0.0035 kt in Iceland, a difference of 0.0265 kt.
That makes Kenya's figure about 8.6 times Iceland's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 56th and Kenya ranks 54th of 63 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0012 kt | 0.065 kt | 0.0638 kt | Kenya |
| 2000s | 0.0024 kt | 0.03 kt | 0.0276 kt | Kenya |
| 2010s | 0.0032 kt | 0.03 kt | 0.0268 kt | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc, Iceland or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 0.03 kt against 0.0035 kt in Iceland as of 2010.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc between Iceland and Kenya?
- 0.0265 kt, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Kenya?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2010.
- How do Iceland and Kenya rank globally for lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc?
- Iceland ranks 56th and Kenya ranks 54th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf