Kenya vs Moldova: LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC over time
- Kenya
- Moldova
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 0.03 kt against 0.0025 kt in Moldova, a difference of 0.0275 kt.
That makes Kenya's figure about 12.0 times Moldova's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 59th and Moldova ranks 62nd of 69 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.065 kt | 0.002 kt | 0.063 kt | Kenya |
| 2000s | 0.03 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0294 kt | Kenya |
| 2010s | 0.03 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0297 kt | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc, Kenya or Moldova?
- Kenya, at 0.03 kt against 0.0025 kt in Moldova as of 2010.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc between Kenya and Moldova?
- 0.0275 kt, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Moldova?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2010.
- How do Kenya and Moldova rank globally for lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc?
- Kenya ranks 59th and Moldova ranks 62nd of 69 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf