Kyrgyzstan vs Monaco: LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Monaco
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.0005 kt against 0 kt in Monaco, a difference of 0.0005 kt.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 58th and Monaco ranks 60th of 60 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0004 kt | 0 kt | 0.0004 kt | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 0.0006 kt | 0 kt | 0.0006 kt | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 0.0005 kt | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc, Kyrgyzstan or Monaco?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.0005 kt against 0 kt in Monaco as of 2010.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc between Kyrgyzstan and Monaco?
- 0.0005 kt, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Monaco?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2010.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Monaco rank globally for lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 58th and Monaco ranks 60th of 60 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf