Latvia vs Sweden: LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC over time
- Latvia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 4.32 kt against 2.1 kt in Latvia, a difference of 2.22 kt.
That makes Sweden's figure about 2.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 28 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 15th and Sweden ranks 14th of 63 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.93 kt | 4.11 kt | 2.18 kt | Sweden |
| 2000s | 1.95 kt | 4.24 kt | 2.29 kt | Sweden |
| 2010s | 2.02 kt | 4.1 kt | 2.08 kt | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc, Latvia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 4.32 kt against 2.1 kt in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc between Latvia and Sweden?
- 2.22 kt, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sweden?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Sweden rank globally for lulucf — emissions (n2o) — unfccc?
- Latvia ranks 15th and Sweden ranks 14th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf