Oceania vs South Sudan: LULUCF — Emissions Share
Oceania
0.26 %
in 2023
South Sudan
2.59 %
in 2023
Oceania rank
19th
South Sudan rank
18th
LULUCF — Emissions Share over time
- Oceania
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 2.59 % against 0.26 % in Oceania, a difference of 2.33 %.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 10.0 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Oceania ranks 19th and South Sudan ranks 18th of 34 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.15 % | 1.93 % | 0.7888 % | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.9525 % | 3.55 % | 2.6 % | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions share, Oceania or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 2.59 % against 0.26 % in Oceania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions share between Oceania and South Sudan?
- 2.33 %, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Oceania and South Sudan rank globally for lulucf — emissions share?
- Oceania ranks 19th and South Sudan ranks 18th of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.