Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Mayotte: LULUCF — Emissions Share
Democratic Republic of the Congo
97.28 %
in 2023
Mayotte
100 %
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
1st
Mayotte rank
6th
LULUCF — Emissions Share over time
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Mayotte
How they compare
Mayotte currently reports 100 % against 97.28 % in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 2.72 %.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Mayotte has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 1st and Mayotte ranks 6th of 20 regions.
Mayotte has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of the Congo | Mayotte | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 99.16 % | 100 % | 0.844 % | Mayotte |
| 2000s | 99.38 % | 100 % | 0.619 % | Mayotte |
| 2010s | 98.75 % | 100 % | 1.25 % | Mayotte |
| 2020s | 97.37 % | 100 % | 2.63 % | Mayotte |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions share, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Mayotte?
- Mayotte, at 100 % against 97.28 % in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions share between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Mayotte?
- 2.72 %, with Mayotte ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Mayotte?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Mayotte rank globally for lulucf — emissions share?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 1st and Mayotte ranks 6th of 20 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.