Oceania vs South Sudan: LULUCF — Emissions Share
Oceania
1.2 %
in 2023
South Sudan
81.04 %
in 2023
Oceania rank
19th
South Sudan rank
16th
LULUCF — Emissions Share over time
- Oceania
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 81.04 % against 1.2 % in Oceania, a difference of 79.84 %.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 67.5 times Oceania's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Oceania ranks 19th and South Sudan ranks 16th of 34 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -2.83 % | 83.59 % | 86.42 % | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.81 % | 82.17 % | 81.36 % | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions share, Oceania or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 81.04 % against 1.2 % in Oceania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions share between Oceania and South Sudan?
- 79.84 %, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Oceania and South Sudan rank globally for lulucf — emissions share?
- Oceania ranks 19th and South Sudan ranks 16th of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.