Americas vs Bhutan: LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq)
Americas
10.04 %
in 2023
Bhutan
56.46 %
in 2023
Americas rank
14th
Bhutan rank
16th
LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq) over time
- Americas
- Bhutan
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 56.46 % against 10.04 % in Americas, a difference of 46.42 %.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 5.6 times Americas's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bhutan ahead.
Americas ranks 14th and Bhutan ranks 16th of 34 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Americas averaged higher in 1 and Bhutan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Americas | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.85 % | 142.22 % | 128.38 % | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 8.12 % | 157.6 % | 149.48 % | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 3.3 % | -8.5 % | 11.81 % | Americas |
| 2020s | 9.31 % | 41.7 % | 32.38 % | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions share (co2eq), Americas or Bhutan?
- Bhutan, at 56.46 % against 10.04 % in Americas as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions share (co2eq) between Americas and Bhutan?
- 46.42 %, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Americas and Bhutan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Americas and Bhutan rank globally for lulucf — emissions share (co2eq)?
- Americas ranks 14th and Bhutan ranks 16th of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.