Belarus vs Mayotte: LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq)

Belarus
773.13 %
in 2023
Mayotte
100 %
in 2023
Belarus rank
2nd
Mayotte rank
5th

LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq) over time

  • Belarus
  • Mayotte
02505007501.0k1.2k199020062023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 773.13 % against 100 % in Mayotte, a difference of 673.13 %.

That makes Belarus's figure about 7.7 times Mayotte's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Mayotte ahead.

Belarus ranks 2nd and Mayotte ranks 5th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Mayotte in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Mayotte Difference Ahead
1990s -14.23 % 100 % 114.23 % Mayotte
2000s -5.74 % 100 % 105.74 % Mayotte
2010s 1.84 % 100 % 98.16 % Mayotte
2020s 737.47 % 100 % 637.47 % Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lulucf — emissions share (co2eq), Belarus or Mayotte?
Belarus, at 773.13 % against 100 % in Mayotte as of 2023.
What is the difference in lulucf — emissions share (co2eq) between Belarus and Mayotte?
673.13 %, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mayotte?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Mayotte rank globally for lulucf — emissions share (co2eq)?
Belarus ranks 2nd and Mayotte ranks 5th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 8,042 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.