Congo vs Croatia: LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq)
Congo
-17.97 %
in 2023
Croatia
-18.32 %
in 2023
Congo rank
199th
Croatia rank
200th
LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq) over time
- Congo
- Croatia
How they compare
Congo currently reports -17.97 % against -18.32 % in Croatia, a difference of 0.35 %.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 199th and Croatia ranks 200th of 209 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.05 % | -3.41 % | 40.46 % | Congo |
| 2000s | 31.51 % | -2.89 % | 34.4 % | Congo |
| 2010s | 37.77 % | -12.55 % | 50.32 % | Congo |
| 2020s | -3.79 % | -20.14 % | 16.35 % | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions share (co2eq), Congo or Croatia?
- Congo, at -17.97 % against -18.32 % in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions share (co2eq) between Congo and Croatia?
- 0.35 %, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Croatia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Croatia rank globally for lulucf — emissions share (co2eq)?
- Congo ranks 199th and Croatia ranks 200th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.