Cuba vs Ecuador: LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq)

Cuba
13 %
in 2023
Ecuador
14.27 %
in 2023
Cuba rank
62nd
Ecuador rank
59th

LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq) over time

  • Cuba
  • Ecuador
-75-50-2502550199020062023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 14.27 % against 13 % in Cuba, a difference of 1.27 %.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 62nd and Ecuador ranks 59th of 209 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s -18.5 % 44.32 % 62.81 % Ecuador
2000s -60.3 % 34.68 % 94.98 % Ecuador
2010s -14.24 % 24.73 % 38.97 % Ecuador
2020s 6.16 % 19.05 % 12.89 % Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lulucf — emissions share (co2eq), Cuba or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 14.27 % against 13 % in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in lulucf — emissions share (co2eq) between Cuba and Ecuador?
1.27 %, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Ecuador?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Ecuador rank globally for lulucf — emissions share (co2eq)?
Cuba ranks 62nd and Ecuador ranks 59th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 8,042 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.