Ecuador vs Philippines: LULUCF — Emissions Share

Ecuador
0.09 %
in 2023
Philippines
0.14 %
in 2023
Ecuador rank
74th
Philippines rank
73rd

LULUCF — Emissions Share over time

  • Ecuador
  • Philippines
00.20.40.60.8199020062023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 0.14 % against 0.09 % in Ecuador, a difference of 0.05 %.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.6 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Philippines ahead.

Ecuador ranks 74th and Philippines ranks 73rd of 209 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Philippines Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1 % 0.27 % 0.17 % Philippines
2000s 0.079 % 0.201 % 0.122 % Philippines
2010s 0.111 % 0.231 % 0.12 % Philippines
2020s 0.1075 % 0.125 % 0.0175 % Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lulucf — emissions share, Ecuador or Philippines?
Philippines, at 0.14 % against 0.09 % in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in lulucf — emissions share between Ecuador and Philippines?
0.05 %, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Philippines?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Philippines rank globally for lulucf — emissions share?
Ecuador ranks 74th and Philippines ranks 73rd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions Share (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
LULUCF — Emissions Share (N2O)
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 8,018 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.