Australia and New Zealand vs Kazakhstan: Maize (corn) — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
100,577 t
in 2050
Kazakhstan
125,622 t
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
82nd
Kazakhstan rank
79th

Maize (corn) — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Kazakhstan
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196120052050

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 125,622 t against 100,577 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 25,045 t.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 82nd and Kazakhstan ranks 79th of 168 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 72,163 t 82,852 t 10,689 t Kazakhstan
2000s 86,950 t 95,020 t 8,070 t Kazakhstan
2010s 79,919 t 124,201 t 44,282 t Kazakhstan
2020s 70,740 t 182,790 t 112,051 t Kazakhstan
2030s 96,200 t 117,142 t 20,942 t Kazakhstan
2050s 100,577 t 125,622 t 25,045 t Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher maize (corn) — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 125,622 t against 100,577 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in maize (corn) — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Kazakhstan?
25,045 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Kazakhstan?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Kazakhstan rank globally for maize (corn) — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 82nd and Kazakhstan ranks 79th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Maize (corn) — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Kazakhstan: Maize (corn) — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/kazakhstan/">Australia and New Zealand vs Kazakhstan: Maize (corn) — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Maize (corn) — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
220 places, 12,342 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).