New Zealand vs Sudan: Maize (corn) — Burning crop residues
Maize (corn) — Burning crop residues over time
- New Zealand
- Sudan
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 24,072 t against 23,267 t in Sudan, a difference of 805 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
New Zealand ranks 115th and Sudan ranks 117th of 168 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18,617 t | 30,658 t | 12,041 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 17,287 t | 22,924 t | 5,637 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher maize (corn) — burning crop residues, New Zealand or Sudan?
- New Zealand, at 24,072 t against 23,267 t in Sudan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in maize (corn) — burning crop residues between New Zealand and Sudan?
- 805 t, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Sudan rank globally for maize (corn) — burning crop residues?
- New Zealand ranks 115th and Sudan ranks 117th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Maize (corn) — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).