Australia and New Zealand vs Rwanda: Maize (corn) — Crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
0.0953 kt
in 2050
Rwanda
0.1018 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
74th
Rwanda rank
73rd

Maize (corn) — Crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Rwanda
00.0250.050.0750.1196120052050

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.1018 kt against 0.0953 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.0065 kt.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 74th and Rwanda ranks 73rd of 164 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 7 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0281 kt 0.0071 kt 0.021 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 0.0398 kt 0.0119 kt 0.0279 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 0.0489 kt 0.0166 kt 0.0323 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 0.056 kt 0.0137 kt 0.0423 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 0.0725 kt 0.0213 kt 0.0512 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 0.077 kt 0.0703 kt 0.0068 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 0.0673 kt 0.076 kt 0.0087 kt Rwanda
2030s 0.0871 kt 0.0552 kt 0.0319 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 0.0953 kt 0.1018 kt 0.0065 kt Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher maize (corn) — crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.1018 kt against 0.0953 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in maize (corn) — crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Rwanda?
0.0065 kt, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Rwanda?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Rwanda rank globally for maize (corn) — crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 74th and Rwanda ranks 73rd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Maize (corn) — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Rwanda: Maize (corn) — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/rwanda/">Australia and New Zealand vs Rwanda: Maize (corn) — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Maize (corn) — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
216 places, 12,281 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).