Central African Republic vs Russian Federation: Maize (corn) — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Central African Republic
2.85 % change on previous year
in 2023
Russian Federation
3.45 % change on previous year
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
77th
Russian Federation rank
74th

Maize (corn) — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Russian Federation
-50050100150196219922023

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 3.45 % change on previous year against 2.85 % change on previous year in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.6 % change on previous year.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.2 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 77th and Russian Federation ranks 74th of 174 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 6.27 % change on previous year 12.07 % change on previous year 5.8 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2000s 5.62 % change on previous year 20.75 % change on previous year 15.12 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2010s -1.58 % change on previous year 17.72 % change on previous year 19.3 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2020s 27.46 % change on previous year 3.49 % change on previous year 23.97 % change on previous year Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher maize (corn) — crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Central African Republic or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 3.45 % change on previous year against 2.85 % change on previous year in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in maize (corn) — crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Central African Republic and Russian Federation?
0.6 % change on previous year, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Russian Federation?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Russian Federation rank globally for maize (corn) — crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Central African Republic ranks 77th and Russian Federation ranks 74th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Maize (corn) — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Russian Federation: Maize (corn) — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/central-african-republic/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/central-african-republic/russian-federation-2/">Central African Republic vs Russian Federation: Maize (corn) — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Maize (corn) — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 11,143 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Maize (corn) — Crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.